| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Pratt–Yorke opinion ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Pratt–Yorke opinion
The Pratt-York opinion also known as the Camden-Yorke opinion was a 1757 official legal opinion issued jointly by Charles Pratt, 1st Earl Camden, the Attorney General for England and Wales, and Charles Yorke, the Solicitor General for England and Wales (and former counsel to the East India Company), regarding the legality of land purchases by the British East India Company from the rulers of the Princely states in British India.
In large part due to this opinion, India is one of the few common law jurisdiction which has rejected the doctrine of aboriginal title.〔''Freeman v. Fairie'' (1828) 1 Moo. IA 305.〕〔''Vaje Singji Jorava Ssingji v Secretary of State for India'' (1924) L.R. 51 I.A. 357.〕〔''Virendra Singh & Ors v. The State of Uttar Pradesh'' () INSC 55.〕〔''Vinod Kumar Shantilal Gosalia v. Gangadhar Narsingdas Agarwal & Ors'' () INSC 150.〕〔''Sardar Govindrao & Ors v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors'' () INSC 52.〕〔''R.C. Poudyal & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors'' () INSC 77.〕
==Origin==
The opinion was issued in response to a petition from the British East India Company.〔 The Company had previously been involved in land disputes with regular army officers—both over land acquired by purchase and land acquired by conquest.〔Bowen, 2002, p. 53.〕
The opinion was reported on 24 December 1757.〔Bowen, 2002, p. 54.〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Pratt–Yorke opinion」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|